Today I did a proof of those in the MBA: microeconomics, macroeconomics and economic policy. Beauty, eh!? And you know how long we need to know "everything" and already being prepared for the test? 3 WEEKS. Yes! But ok, I survived to tell this story, so're worth.
I've done three tests so far, but none were as funny as this. Why? Because without proof I used to want to vent and I'm not impressed to have been depressed after that. The questions were in part about economic policy and there he asked about the conflicts which exist in our country on policies related to social security of citizens. At that time I've read "social security" and "conflict", I immediately thought of our system of retirement and unemployment insurance. Yeah, I could not, had to vent.
I explained what he wanted to hear, namely that there are conflicts because of different interests that divide society into different stakeholder groups and make the strongest, ie, the government (not that I wrote ... hehehe). I explained that we contribute in our society must work when registered with the system of social health and helping guarantee our poor public pension, but that the social health system is a &% *%, and (read the comments about it, as I discovered after posting SUS and INSS this post are two separate things that work), so when you have a little more money, the citizen pays this insurance more private insurance carissimo to ensure a happier and healthier old age. But many people who have no work, fails to pay and still get the benefit by age. Is it fair? This is where the conflict comes to an ideal division of wealth among citizens. Anyway.
Then came the story of unemployment insurance. I explained that in Brazil is not deducted from our salaries to ensure a share of unemployment insurance in the country and when we were unemployed we only have a right to receive help to survive for 3 months (full info on that item in the comments), which obliges us to run after the injury. And the government is obliged to give all workers a percentage of salary to fund unemployment in the country? Conflict in sight. Do you believe that we paid the money would actually be used for this purpose in its entirety? Do you really think this would solve the unemployment problem in Brazil? Look around and think with a good unemployment insurance would you want to go back to look for work. I do not. (((-:
But worse than the outburst was a "gaffe" intercultural. In one of the exercises I had to give an example of how an external factor may adversely affect in a process in society. In class we discussed about it taking as an example a case where the edge of a river is playing a sawmill wood residues in river flow and the other point of the river has a fish breeder. As I do not exactly remember how locksmiths in German (Schloss), I decided to open and close the sawmill that produces a chemical toxic effluents. Ai said that the industry dumping toxic waste into the river, was causing many fish breeder fish to become ill and that he was taking damage, while the industry still ensuring their profits at the expense of the poor health of fish. And there? And that's when a German will take to process than in the outside world is very country, where the chemical (though forbidden) still play chemical residues in riverbeds. And here it is, I believe, impossible. Well, I wrote this whole long history and the only thing I realized when I finished the thought. So, just to be safe, I wrote that in Brazil at the end of this situation still exists, despite being prohibited by law, but that he would replace "toxic effluent" with "hot water", ie, the habitat of the fish was being changed the average temperature rise of that river. If it makes sense? I do not know, just know it's hard to explain what is "jack" for German. ((((-:
PS1: retirement in Germany is a beauty, but also there are many people who criticize (as always and everywhere), it has much more here than old people in the market to ensure that the pension system continues to function like this. According to my teacher already has lots of projects being voted to change the system, to try and make it more fair, because today a good share of the contribution comes from expatriates who are temporarily living here (it was one of the solutions that the government found to plug the hole temporarily, since according to Arlete informed me down, back when the employee may request their contribution back - read more in the comments). Already the lives of unemployed here was a paradise, but this year much has changed and the guys will have to get moving if they want to keep the Mercedes in the garage. 're Laughing? The deal was too good, however a lot of people unemployed was on purpose, it were better with the help of the government of killing during that week.
PS2: I'm not comparing. I spoke to one system and another, something good and something bad for German and only thing bad for Brazil. )))-:
PS3: The best system is the system of Darwin, that is, the system of natural selection. Oh okay, I'll set a political party when you return. Very soon I write my proposal to the government for you here. (((-:
Recent Comments